60
112" x 60" Supply and exhaust duct runs per M-301 do not fit within space provided between overhead steel framing of screen wall and roof structure per S-301 as shown on A-302.
A-102A
2
Discipline Coordination
20
Four Seasons Private Residences
Henderson, NV
Arch
STRUC
Mech
15
Building Sector C has (2) egress paths and both lead to horizontal exits which are not compliant with IBC 1026.1. Provide a compliant second means of egress (exit stair) from all sector C levels.
A-101B
3
Building Code
70
UU HMH Translational Research Building
Salt Lake City, UT
Arch
STRUC
Interior
75
The seismic joint crossing the firewall will compromise the integrity of the required 3-HR fire rating along the entire height of the building. Confirm design intent and relocate the seismic joint to avoid rated assemblies.
A-101C
2
Constructability
50
Ridge Walk North Living & Learning Neighborhood
La Jolla, CA
Arch
STRUC
40
6" POC Sanitary Sewer pipe size & location from Parking Structure per 1CU201 Civil Sewer Plan & 1CU102 Civil Utility Plan does not match 4" per 4.PL100 Underground Garage Plumbing Plan.
1.AS101
2
Discipline Coordination
75
99 Monitor Street
Jersey City, NJ
Arch
Civil
Plumb
40
The number of private parking spaces does not comply with CBC Table 11B-208.2, which requires one accessible parking space. CBC 11B-208.2 specifies that if multiple parking facilities exist on site, the required accessible spaces must be calculated for each facility individually.
A-101C
3
Accessibility (ADA)
75
Torrey Pines Fire Station 52
La Jolla, CA
Arch
Civil
Land
Four Seasons Private Residences
Henderson, NV
A-0000
The seismic joint crossing the firewall will compromise the integrity of the required 3-HR fire rating along the entire height of the building. Confirm design intent and relocate the seismic joint to avoid rated assemblies.
Priority Level
Discipline Coordination
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Quality Assurance & Risk Management

By introducing our review services into your preconstruction process, projects consistently perform better financially while avoiding unnecessary, costly conflicts that cause schedule delays & risk relationships.
up
to
70% Less
RFI’s & change orders
up
to
2-5%
total savings
up
to
84x ROI
return on investment
up
to
208+M
SQ FT Reviewed
REVIEW TYPES

Customizable review focuses allow your team to tailor our services precisely to meet your project's specific requirements.

01
02
03
04
05

Raising the
Standard-of-Care

Our expert team identifies potential issues early, ensuring accuracy and minimizing risks. By setting higher standards in preconstruction, we help you avoid costly errors and streamline your workflow, introducing confidence and accountability to achieve exceptional project results.

A la cart review focuses ensure that our team can provide value for any project budget or schedule.  With minimal lead times, same day, no cost proposals, and industry-wide local knowledge, our experts are available whenever you need us.


Our team of licensed industry experts is purposefully diverse, ensuring each project is guided by the right expertise. With a nationwide network of full-time reviewers, we bring meaningful, localized experience to every assignment, including insights into specific local authorities and jurisdictional requirements.

Our reviews are never performed by a single individual.  Each project is reviewed by a team is comprised of 4 to 12 experts selected based on their relevant experience relative to the project’s unique scope.


Each client is assigned a single-point of contact call the 'lead reviewer' who manages all their team's reviews. The lead reviewer is responsible for overseeing the review team and can calibrate the review's to match your team's exact needs.

Our cloud-based reports simplify teamwork, delivering enhanced mark-ups and analytics that empower you to take immediate action. Resolve potential issues before they escalate, keeping your projects on track and stress-free.

OUR PROCESS

Our systematic approach has been developed to provide maximum flexibility and consistent, reliable results.

Interested in a review proposal?

Start a Proposal
01
Proposal Co-Development
Based on your project’s current documentation, and target review phase, our team will prepare our recommended proposal.   Once issued, your team will have the ability to further customize the review scope to match your budgetary or schedule needs.

02
Review Analysis
A team of licensed experts are selected based on project relevant experience by your lead reviewer to perform a series of focused reviews.  Review teams typically range from 4 - 12  experts depending on the scale and complexity of the project.

03
Report Issuance
The completed review report & deliverables will issued via our secure client web app. Following the issuance of the completed report, your team will have the ability to schedule a post review consultation to ask any questions regarding the findings with the lead reviewer.

Improved Financial Performance

Construction

TYPE-IIB

TOTAL AREA (SF)

392,000

EST. CONSTRUCTION

$176,400,000

By conducting a comprehensive review with us, we estimate you can save between  $3.37 M  and  $8.43 M in avoided RFIs, change orders, and schedule delays.

Avoidable errors and deficiencies within your construction documents lead to costly delays, RFIs, and change orders during construction. Our comprehensive reviews identify potential issues early, reducing up to 70% of RFIs and change orders to keep your project on time and within budget. Save 2-5% of your total budget upfront by minimizing risks and protecting profitability from day one.

Disclaimer: Projected savings are provided "as is" and are based on industry data. NCBR, Inc. makes no warranties regarding their accuracy. Actual savings may vary based on geographic and project-specific factors.

Take a closer look at our review reports

Request Proposal
Advanced Features

Our intuitive reports streamline communication, with concise and object feedback that highlights critical issues first.

0

Enhanced Mark-Ups

Quickly filter, sort, & search review findings to address issues with ease.

Data-Driven Analytics

Interactive dashboards reveal underlying trends & key metrics.

Top Ten Critical Findings

Key high-risk items that will require immediate attention & resolution.

Completeness Checklist

Baseline confirmation of industry standards and conventions.

Cloud-Based Reports

All reports and deliverables are hosted online within your account.

Collaboration & Sharing

Easily share your completed review report among your project team.

Post-Review Consultation

Schedule a virtual meeting with your lead reviewer to discuss findings.

Understanding our
enhanced mark-up system

Comment Filters
Priority Levels
Level 03  -  Critical
Comment Category
All Comments
Discipline tags
Structural
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Discipline Overlays
structural
Mechanical
Electrical
plumbing
fire protection
interior design
technology
A-102A
Level 01  Plan Sector A
Discipline Coordination
8” Concrete wall extents per S-102A do not match layout shown on A-102A at STAIR-03.  Structural layout conflicts with adjacent mechanical duct riser as shown on M-102A.  Dimensionally locate concrete wall extents on slab plan.
Priority Level  -  CRITICAL
Discipline Tags
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
PREVIOUS
NEXT

Take control of your project with our enhanced mark-ups, empowering you to easily filter, sort & search the review findings.

Interactive Overlays
We utilize an intuitive layer management system for overlays enabling users to isolate relevant discipline scope for each comment.
Priority-Levels
Priority levels help provide a hierarchy as to which comments should be addressed first, with level 3 being the most critical.
Comment Categories
Our categorized comments enable our clients to quickly sort and filter comments based on the type of issue being highlighted.
Discipline Tags
Priority levels help provide a hierarchy as to which comments should be addressed first, with level 3 being the most critical.

We work with the building industry’s top companies

Active Clients
350+
Client Retention
94%

CHECKSET has become an invaluable part of our team. We greatly appreciate the knowledge, thoroughness and quality work of their staff. Having Checkset involved allows our projects to remain on schedule and within budget, which is important to us and our clients.

Michele Gargano

Studio W Architects

Working with CHECKSET Review has allowed our project teams to produce a higher level of documentation by identifying potential deficiencies, at times providing important considerations that we review as lessons learned with our entire staff. The online portal provides a simple interface that is easily digestible while the Bluebeam produced PDF Review documents serve as a great coordination record document.

Tony Pacheco-Taylor

Studio W Architects

I appreciate CHECKSET's reviews which provide a diligent and thorough review of our documents. Their third party review elevates the level of our documentation, requiring the design team to answer questions they might have overlooked without CheckSET’s outside perspective.

Jon Hall

GGLO

CHECKSET provides an extra set of eyes to review our new development projects for critical constructability and coordination issues that would cause project delays downstream. Partnering with them over the past few years, they have been receptive to our feedback to refine their reviews to meet our specific needs. They have become an integral part of our design review process prior to construction.

George Elias

AvalonBay Communities

CHECKSET was our first choice due to their past excellence with our other projects at reasonable rates. Their commitment to accuracy, coordination, professionalism and detail, compliments our in-house standards and expectations.

Anthony Tarra

JCJ Architects

We value the comprehensive review of our documents from CHECKSET through all disciplines, we feel that a fresh set of eyes from a third party contributes to their quality.

Christopher Garcia

Studio W Architects

The CHECKSET review, presentation format of their findings, and associated analytics are like nothing I’ve seen before. We’ve utilized other plan review firms, but none have been as thorough and detailed as CHECKSET. We have no doubt that the information they’ve provided will enhance the completeness of our contract documents and mitigate potential RFI’s, changes, and/or resulting delays. We look forward to partnering with them again on future projects.

Allan Hartman

Okland Construction

Working with CHECKSET Review in preconstruction has significantly reduced the number of post bid RFIs and change orders on our projects. Their expertise in catching potential issues early on has been instrumental in providing predictable results for our clients.

Eric Swenson

Layton Construction

CHECKSET has been phenomenal to work with.  They are very communicative, highly responsive, and produces tangible, meaningful improvements in our work.  



They are supremely good at what they do and are considered an valuable investment in each project.

Ana Woods

Taylor Design

Industry Expertise
By Sector

Airports + Aviation
Civic + Government
Commercial + Office
Education / Institutional
Health + Science
Justice + Correctional
Hospitality + Retail
Infrastructure + Facilities
Interior Design
Mixed-Use Development
Multi-Family + AFFORDABLE
Single-Family Residential
Sports Facilities & Arenas
Restaurants & Food Services
All
Sector
All
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Ready to protect your construction budget & schedule?

Frequently Asked Questions

Request Proposal

Absolutely. Our preliminary proposal, or "recommended" proposal, is designed to provide a comprehensive review tailored to your project's scale, complexity, and documentation level. Think of it as a starting point. You’re free to adjust the scope to align with your budget and schedule needs. Every project is unique, and we encourage you to customize our services to ensure the review fits your specific requirements. There’s no one-size-fits-all solution—just what works best for you.

Yes, they can. Many of our clients prefer to include our fee in their proposals before the contract documents are fully developed. In these cases, simply share any available project information, and we’ll provide an initial review estimate. Once the documents intended for review are ready, we’ll confirm and refine the estimate as needed.

We’re here to help. If you have follow-up questions about our findings- whether it’s about next steps, a code interpretation, or exploring potential solutions- our experts are available for virtual meetings at no additional cost to our ongoing clients. Clear communication is part of our commitment to your project’s success.

Every project is unique, so we create custom proposals tailored to your needs. Simply share your latest drawing set, and we’ll provide a recommended preliminary proposal. This proposal includes a detailed breakdown of the estimated hours based on the review scope, along with a submission schedule.  From there, you can move forward with our recommendation or adjust the scope to fit your budget and timeline.

We typically prepare review proposals within 24 hours of your request. Once approved, our review teams can begin as early as the next business day. With a 100% utilization rate, you only pay for the agreed-upon review time- no overhead, no downtime.

Yes, we are. Our hybrid staffing model combines the expertise of our full-time remote reviewers with a network of licensed architects from across the country. This ensures your review team includes professionals with deep knowledge of local authorities having jurisdiction (AHJs) and regional construction practices. For example, if your project is in Boston, at least one team member will be from the area and familiar with local building codes and amendments. This approach ensures both local insight and nationwide expertise.